Normative Power Europe? The EU's Embrace of the Responsibility to Protect in a Transitional International Order

15Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article assesses the EU's engagement with the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) norm and considers the scope for its integration into the EU's activities and global strategy. We examine how the EU's engagement with R2P tests its normative leadership in the context of internal and external political challenges to its authority. We expand on previous studies of the EU's failure to live by example over R2P by adding a missing analytical dimension – trends at the global level – and by suggesting an alternative explanation for the apparent ambivalence towards R2P in some parts of the EU. The EU has engaged with R2P – albeit labelling it differently at times – more than many observers recognize and despite bureaucratic resistance and diverging national approaches. Rather, the fundamental constraint on the EU's role in promoting R2P relates to a transitional international order in which the EU's normative traction is in decline and European foreign policy elites are increasingly pragmatic and cautious.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Newman, E., & Stefan, C. G. (2020). Normative Power Europe? The EU’s Embrace of the Responsibility to Protect in a Transitional International Order. Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(2), 472–490. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12953

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free