Measuring brain variability via sulcal lines registration: A diffeomorphic approach

33Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper we present a new way of measuring brain variability based on the registration of sulcai lines sets in the large deformation framework. Lines are modelled geometrically as currents, avoiding then matchings based on point correspondences. At the end we retrieve a globally consistent deformation of the underlying brain space that best matches the lines. Thanks to this framework the measured variability is defined everywhere whereas a previous method introduced by P. Fillard requires tensors extrapolation. Evaluating both methods on the same database, we show that our new approach enables to describe different details of the variability and to highlight the major trends of deformation in the database thanks to a Tangent-PCA analysis. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007.

References Powered by Scopus

Theory of reproducing kernels

4080Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A new point matching algorithm for non-rigid registration

1374Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A riemannian framework for tensor computing

1224Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Statistical shape analysis, with applications in R: Second edition

464Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Large deformation diffeomorphic metric curve mapping

179Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Statistical models of sets of curves and surfaces based on currents

126Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Durrleman, S., Pennec, X., Trouvé, A., & Ayache, N. (2007). Measuring brain variability via sulcal lines registration: A diffeomorphic approach. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4791 LNCS, pp. 675–682). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75757-3_82

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

40%

Researcher 9

36%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

24%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 10

43%

Mathematics 7

30%

Neuroscience 3

13%

Engineering 3

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free