Predictors of digital support services use by informal caregivers: A cross-sectional comparative survey

7Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives Digital support services may provide informal caregivers with remote access to information and training about care issues. However, there is limited specific data on how factors such as demographics, socioeconomic resources and the caregiving context may influence caregivers' use of digital support services. The aim of this study is to identify associations between informal caregiver's characteristics and the use of the internet to access digital support services in two countries: Italy and Sweden. Setting and participants A sample of 663 respondents who have access to the internet participated in a cross-sectional survey by completing the online questionnaire. Respondents were recruited by the Italian National Institute of Health and Science on Ageing and the Swedish Family Care Competence Centre. Primary and secondary outcome measures Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess predictors of caregivers' frequent use of the internet to access digital support services. Results Educational attainment (OR 3.649, 95% CI 1.424 to 9.350, p=0.007), hours per week spent caring (OR 2.928, 95% CI 1.481 to 5.791, p=0.002), total household income (OR 0.378, 95% CI 0.149 to 0.957, p=0.040), care recipient relationship to the caregiver (OR 2.895, 95% CI 1.037 to 8.083, p=0.042) and gender of care recipient (OR 0.575, 95% CI 0.356 to 0.928, p=0.023) were significant predictors in the multivariate analysis for the Italian caregivers group. Hours per week spent caring (OR 2.401, 95% CI 1.105 to 5.218, p=0.027) and age of caregiver (OR 2.237, 95% CI 1.150 to 4.352, p=0.018) were significant predictors in the multivariate analysis for the Swedish caregivers group. Conclusions Digital support services could be important tools to empower informal caregivers. When it comes to policy and practice in relation to caregivers, similarly to other broad vulnerable groups, there is no € one-size-fits-all' approach, and it is therefore important to consider the specific characteristics and needs of both caregivers and care recipients.

References Powered by Scopus

Models in information behaviour research

1394Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Use of the Internet and E-mail for Health Care Information: Results from a National Survey

963Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Informal caregiving and its impact on health: a reappraisal from population-based studies

611Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Performance evaluation of the Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays by comparison with neutralizing antibodies and clinical assessment

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Caregivers’ willingness to pay for digital support services: Comparative survey

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Digital technologies as sources of information for patients and caregivers during COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hassan, A. Y. I., Lamura, G., & Hagedoorn, M. (2022). Predictors of digital support services use by informal caregivers: A cross-sectional comparative survey. BMJ Open, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059897

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

56%

Researcher 3

33%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 4

44%

Social Sciences 2

22%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

22%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free