Asthma Prevalence and Phenotyping in the General Population: The LEAD (Lung, hEart, sociAl, boDy) Study

4Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Asthma is a chronic heterogeneous respiratory disease involving differential pathophysiological pathways and consequently distinct asthma phenotypes. Objective and Methods: In the LEAD Study, a general population cohort (n=11.423) in Vienna ranging from 6–82 years of age, we addressed the prevalence of asthma and explored inflammatory asthma phenotypes that included allergic and non-allergic asthma, and within these phenotypes, an eosinophilic (eosinophils ≥300 cells/µL, or ≥150 cells/µL in the presence of ICS medication) or non-eosinophilic (eosinophils <300 cells/µL, or <150 cells/µL in the presence of ICS) phenotype. In addition, we compared various factors related to biomarkers, body composition, lung function, and symptoms in control subjects versus subjects with current asthma (current doctor’s diagnosis of asthma). Results: An overall prevalence of 4.6% was observed for current asthma. Furthermore, an age-dependent shift from allergic to nonallergic asthma was found. The non-eosinophilic phenotype was more prominent. Obesity was a prevalent condition, and body composition including visceral adipose tissue (VAT), is affected in current asthma versus controls. Conclusion: This broad-aged and large general population cohort identified differential patterns of inflammatory asthma phenotypes that were age-dependent. The presence of eosinophilia was associated with worse asthma control, increased asthma medication, increased VAT, and lower lung function, the opposite was found for the presence of an allergic asthma.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schiffers, C., Wouters, E. F. M., Breyer-Kohansal, R., Buhl, R., Pohl, W., Irvin, C. G., … Hartl, S. (2023). Asthma Prevalence and Phenotyping in the General Population: The LEAD (Lung, hEart, sociAl, boDy) Study. Journal of Asthma and Allergy, 16, 367–382. https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S402326

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free