Electoral cycles, partisan effects and US naturalization policies

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Using a panel of naturalizations in the United States from 1965 to 2012, we empirically analyze the impact of elections on naturalization policy. Our results indicate that naturalization policy is (partly) driven by national elections: there are more naturalizations in presidential election years and during the terms of Democratic incumbents. To disentangle the effect of government policies from changes in the demand for naturalizations, we examine how the acceptance rate of naturalization petitions is affected by elections. The analysis reveals that the acceptance rate is much higher under Democratic incumbents with the strongest increase during the years that are closer to the next presidential election. In contrast, (almost) no variation is found under a Republican incumbent. We then investigate the dynamics of an incumbent’s behavior over the course of his term in detail. Our findings indicate that the effects are more pronounced in politically contested states, in states with many migrants and for immigrants originating from Latin America.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Drometer, M., & Méango, R. (2020). Electoral cycles, partisan effects and US naturalization policies. Public Choice, 183(1–2), 43–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-019-00687-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free