Why go public? Public configurations and the supportive and divergent views towards public district heating in the Netherlands

3Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: Cities are taking up services of social importance under the (re)municipalisation movement. The Dutch government embarked on an ambitious heat transition and proposed in 2022 to make all district heating projects public or semi-public, with a majority public share. This proposal has sparked intense debates among groups in favour of and against a shift to public ownership. Methods: This study assessed 16 public projects through qualitative research and uncovered the arguments for and against public ownership among key public and private stakeholders. Results: While public ownership is deemed necessary to meet social objectives and address the shortcomings of private models, critical views question the economic performance and inappropriate political choices in some public projects. These critical views propose alternative ways to safeguard public values, such as ensuring affordability and meeting climate goals. Despite disagreements, public and private actors recognise the shared responsibility and the importance of the other's role. They agree that the central government's proposed mandate for public ownership may limit flexibility at the local level and prevent other effective configurations like public-private partnerships with equal public-private shares. Discussion: Reflecting on the study findings, it is debatable whether mandating public ownership nationwide, as proposed by the Dutch government, should become the approach to tackle current challenges instead of allowing more flexibility. The upcoming Heat Act may reduce key issues justifying public ownership, such as affordability, cherry-picking and the lack of transparency of private projects. Further research is needed to determine whether public ownership would enhance citizens' support and speed up realisation. Public ownership may still be necessary if social and cost benefits outweigh those from other configurations or long-term concession contracts are too risky. Implementing regulations protecting public values and enabling the coexistence of public, private or public-private configurations tailored to each unique local context could be an alternative, as successful district heating sectors abroad demonstrate.

References Powered by Scopus

Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development

6893Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

State versus Private Ownership

1049Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Incomplete contracts and public ownership: Remarks, and an application to public-private partnerships

586Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Locally-led governance of residential heat transitions: Emerging experience of and lessons from the Dutch approach

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

From consumers to pioneers: insights from thermal energy communities in Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A comparative analysis of policies and strategies supporting district heating expansion and decarbonisation in Denmark, Sweden, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom – Lessons for slow adopters of district heating

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Herreras Martinez, S., Harmsen, R., Menkveld, M., Kramer, G. J., & Faaij, A. (2023). Why go public? Public configurations and the supportive and divergent views towards public district heating in the Netherlands. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2023.1220884

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

74%

Researcher 3

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10

56%

Social Sciences 6

33%

Decision Sciences 1

6%

Energy 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free