Mitosis counting in breast cancer: Object-level interobserver agreement and comparison to an automatic method

101Citations
Citations of this article
93Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background Tumor proliferation speed, most commonly assessed by counting of mitotic figures in histological slide preparations, is an important biomarker for breast cancer. Although mitosis counting is routinely performed by pathologists, it is a tedious and subjective task with poor reproducibility, particularly among non-experts. Inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of mitosis counting can be improved when a strict protocol is defined and followed. Previous studies have examined only the agreement in terms of the mitotic count or the mitotic activity score. Studies of the observer agreement at the level of individual objects, which can provide more insight into the procedure, have not been performed thus far. Methods The development of automatic mitosis detection methods has received large interest in recent years. Automatic image analysis is viewed as a solution for the problem of subjectivity of mitosis counting by pathologists. In this paper we describe the results from an interobserver agreement study between three human observers and an automatic method, and make two unique contributions. For the first time, we present an analysis of the object-level interobserver agreement on mitosis counting. Furthermore, we train an automatic mitosis detection method that is robust with respect to staining appearance variability and compare it with the performance of expert observers on an "external" dataset, i.e. on histopathology images that originate from pathology labs other than the pathology lab that provided the training data for the automatic method. Results The object-level interobserver study revealed that pathologists often do not agree on individual objects, even if this is not reflected in the mitotic count. The disagreement is larger for objects from smaller size, which suggests that adding a size constraint in the mitosis counting protocol can improve reproducibility. The automatic mitosis detection method can perform mitosis counting in an unbiased way, with substantial agreement with human experts.

References Powered by Scopus

Deep learning

63468Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT

42147Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long‐term follow‐up

5146Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Deep learning in mammography and breast histology, an overview and future trends

242Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Whole-Slide Mitosis Detection in H&E Breast Histology Using PHH3 as a Reference to Train Distilled Stain-Invariant Convolutional Networks

218Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Predicting breast tumor proliferation from whole-slide images: The TUPAC16 challenge

211Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Veta, M., Van Diest, P. J., Jiwa, M., Al-Janabi, S., & Pluim, J. P. W. (2016). Mitosis counting in breast cancer: Object-level interobserver agreement and comparison to an automatic method. PLoS ONE, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161286

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 39

67%

Researcher 13

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 24

38%

Engineering 17

27%

Medicine and Dentistry 17

27%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 69

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free