Complications of flexible bronchoscopy in children: Prospective study of 1,328 procedures

180Citations
Citations of this article
90Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Complications of flexible bronchoscopy (FB) were prospectively evaluated during 1,328 diagnostic procedures in children, not in intensive care units. A total 92.8% of the procedures were performed in conscious patients under sedation and 7.2% under deep sedation. Supplementary oxygen was provided in ∼80% of cases via endoscopic face mask (n=783) or nasal prongs (n=290). At least one complication was recorded in 91 cases (6.9%4). Minor complications (n=69; 5.2%) included moderate and transient episodes of desaturation (n=15), isolated excessive coughing (n=22), excessive nausea reflex with coughing (n=20), transient laryngospasm (n=6) and epistaxis (n=6). Major complications (n=22; 1.7%) included oxygen desaturation to <90%, either isolated (n=10) or associated with laryngospasm (n=6), coughing (n=4), bronchospasm (n=1), and pneumothorax (n=1). Major complications involving oxygen desaturation were associated with age <2 yrs (13 of 529 versus 8 of 778) and laryngotracheal abnormalities (7 of 85 versus 14 of 1,222). The overall frequency of complications was similar in conscious (6.7%) but sedated patients and patients under deep (7.3%) sedation. However, the frequency of transient desaturation was significantly higher in children undergoing FB under deep sedation. Transient fever after bronchoalveolar lavage was observed in 52 of 277 cases (18.80%). Flexible bronchoscopy is a safe procedure with <2% major complications. Careful analysis of indications and clinical status for each patient, and proper anaesthesia and monitoring during the examination ensure that the procedure is successful, with a minimum of complications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Blic, J., Marchac, V., & Scheinmann, P. (2002). Complications of flexible bronchoscopy in children: Prospective study of 1,328 procedures. European Respiratory Journal, 20(5), 1271–1276. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.02.02072001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free