Harmonization of Newborn Screening Results for Pompe Disease and Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I

5Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In newborn screening, false-negative results can be disastrous, leading to disability and death, while false-positive results contribute to parental anxiety and unnecessary follow-ups. Cutoffs are set conservatively to prevent missed cases for Pompe and MPS I, resulting in increased falsepositive results and lower positive predictive values. Harmonization has been proposed as a way to minimize false-negative and false-positive results and correct for method differences, so we harmonized enzyme activities for Pompe and MPS I across laboratories and testing methods (Tandem Mass Spectrometry (MS/MS) or Digital Microfluidics (DMF)). Participating states analyzed proofof- concept calibrators, blanks, and contrived specimens and reported enzyme activities, cutoffs, and other testing parameters to Tennessee. Regression and multiples of the median were used to harmonize the data. We observed varied cutoffs and results. Six of seven MS/MS labs reported enzyme activities for one specimen for MPS I marginally above their respective cutoffs with results classified as negative, whereas all DMF labs reported this specimen’s enzyme activity below their respective cutoffs with results classified as positive. Reasonable agreement in enzyme activities and cutoffs was achieved with harmonization; however, harmonization does not change how a value would be reported as this is dependent on the placement of cutoffs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dorley, M. C., Dizikes, G. J., Pickens, C. A., Cuthbert, C., Basheeruddin, K., Gulamali-Majid, F., … Petritis, K. (2023). Harmonization of Newborn Screening Results for Pompe Disease and Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I. International Journal of Neonatal Screening, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns9010011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free