Intra project team disagreement, conflict communications, and team performance in cross-functional new product project teams: A decision-making quality perspective

2Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper develops and examines a model of the antecedents and consequences of decision-making comprehensiveness during the new product development process. This model suggests first a concave relationship between intrateam task disagreement and decision-making comprehensiveness. It also conjectures that conflict communications influence the effectiveness of decision-making comprehensiveness on new product project teams' performance. An empirical test of the proposed framework involves a survey of 220 cross-functional new product project teams. The findings show that an inverse U-shaped relationship exists between a project's intrateam task disagreement and its decision-making comprehensiveness. It also indicates that collaborative communication has a negative effect on innovativeness, whereas contentious communication adversely affects constraint adherence. However, decision-making comprehensiveness partially moderates the relationships between conflict communications and project team performance. Some managerial and research implications of the findings were also discussed in this study.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chang, T. J., & Yeh, S. P. (2014). Intra project team disagreement, conflict communications, and team performance in cross-functional new product project teams: A decision-making quality perspective. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 17(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v17i1.664

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free