Experiencing aging: Analogue versus virtual

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to discuss and compare the impact of an aging suit compared to the virtual experience of aging with the goal of expanding a person’s understanding and felt experience of aging. The authors are both immersed within the area of aging and disability, with one focusing on physical simulations, while the other has adopted virtual simulations to support the development of empathic understanding for others. This chapter shares the experience of each author as they immerse themselves into the simulation currently favoured by the other, so that they can compare both the physical and the virtual from the perspective of the felt experience. Felt experience refers to the personal understanding gained when experiencing the experience of another person’s experience. As our demographics are shifting towards a population of elders, and disability is no longer perceived to be a barrier to quality of life, it becomes the responsibility of developers of services and products to ensure that they understand real people, to ensure that real solutions are offered. On a cognitive level the average person can begin to appreciate how aging and disability could impact another person, however, the authors would profess that until you have dived deeper into that person’s reality (physically or virtually) your understanding is limited. It is argued that experiencing the experience of another person triggers reflection, repositioning of worldviews and a deeper sensitivity than would have been possible before the physical and/or virtual experience. While this approach does not replace the process of aging for individuals, it does provide a valuable tool in the researcher’s blended research tool kit.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McDonagh, D., & Reardanz, D. (2020). Experiencing aging: Analogue versus virtual. In Intelligent Systems Reference Library (Vol. 167, pp. 129–145). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26292-1_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free