Conclusion: Future Directions in Measuring Well-Being

  • Diener E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The studies in the present volume point to several facts that we have learned about defining and measuring well-being. First, we know with a degree of certainty that there are separable components of well-being, such as life judgments versus positive emotions, and we know some of the factors that are more likely to be more associated with certain components versus others. Lucas, Diener, and Suh (1996) showed clearly in a multi-trait multi-method study that several types of wellbeing are discriminable, and the Diener, Kahneman, et al. chapter in this volume shows that these types of well-being are sometimes predicted by very different factors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Diener, E. (2009). Conclusion: Future Directions in Measuring Well-Being (pp. 267–274). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free