Investigating EFL speakers’ gratitude strategies: Interlanguage pragmatics

2Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Gratitude strategies used by EFL speakers have always been the focus of interest by researchers who observed the presence of pragmatic transfer strategies by which speakers express their gratitude. We have seen that several adapted versions of Discourse Completion Tasks (DCTs) by Eisenstein and Bodman (1986) are constructed based on the original version and largely applied to the participants from various backgrounds. A similar methodology is used in this study and we investigated the gratitude strategies of participants, including 80 EFL learners in Turkey and 70 non-native European speakers of English at tertiary-level. We also interviewed with 44 Turkish speaking participants and used two sampling methodologies to identify the participants that could promote the data obtained from the DCTs. Our research entailed quantitative and qualitative data examined through content analysis. Primary findings indicated strong divergences and weak similarities between both speaker groups who resorted to the speech act of thanking compared to non-native European speakers who also differed in thanking strategies. Finally, we have been provided with valuable indications for the constituent parts of the language teaching that neglect the instructional side on the pragmatic use of language for gratitude and other speech acts.

References Powered by Scopus

1065Citations
300Readers
Get full text

Pragmatic transfer

277Citations
118Readers
Get full text
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bakırcı, D., & Özbay, A. Ş. (2020). Investigating EFL speakers’ gratitude strategies: Interlanguage pragmatics. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(4), 1698–1721. https://doi.org/10.17263/JLLS.850982

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

57%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

36%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Linguistics 7

58%

Social Sciences 2

17%

Arts and Humanities 2

17%

Psychology 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0