Genetic variability in natural populations of Zeyheria montana Mart. from the Brazilian Cerrado

9Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Zeyheria montana, an endemic species of the Bignoniaceae family from the Brazilian Cerrado's known for its anti-cancer properties, is widely used as imuno stimulant in the popular medicine and its therapeutic activity must be validated by scientific data. The objective of this work was to evaluate the genetic variability of eight plant populations collected within the state of São Paulo, Brazil, via Random Amplification of Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) used as molecular markers. After an optimized protocol for the amplification reaction, nine selected primers generated 105 reproducible bands, indicating up to 60% polymorphism. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) revealed higher genetic variation within populations (84.03%) than among populations (15.97%). The variation values estimated by φST (0.160) indicated moderate to high inter population structuration. Levels of similarity inter plants with genetic and geographical distances, estimated by the unweighted pair-group method analysis (UPGMA) clustering and non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination methods and by the Mantel test (-0.2345 p = 0.118) denoted that the structure found follows the island model, which assumes that a single population of infinite size may have initiated the existing populations of Zeyheria montana, with no spatial position correlation. Based on the obtained data, a germplasm bank from individuals representing the species variability was established. Furthermore the information here reported can be of importance to develop strategies for the conservation of Z. montana.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bertoni, B. W., Astolfi Filho, S., Martins, E. R., Damião Filho, C. F., França, S. D. C., Pereira, A. M. S., … Diniz Filho, J. A. F. (2007). Genetic variability in natural populations of Zeyheria montana Mart. from the Brazilian Cerrado. Scientia Agricola, 64(4), 409–415. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-90162007000400012

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free