Perioperative lung ultrasound pattern changes in patients undergoing gynecological procedures — a prospective observational study

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: General anesthesia and positive pressure ventilation are associated with perioperative pulmonary complications. Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a method used to evaluate lung parenchyma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate LUS patterns in a cohort of women undergoing gynecological surgery with uncomplicated general anesthesia. Material and methods: Patients were assessed according to the 8-zone LUS assessment protocol used to detect lung sliding, A-lines, B-lines, interstitial syndrome and lung consolidation. Each patient was screened at specific time intervals: before induction of anesthesia, at induction, 30 and 60 minutes after induction and within two hours after recovery. Results: A total of 99 patients undergoing gynecological surgery with uneventful anesthesia from November 2017 to November 2018 were included in this study. A total of 426 LUS records were retained for further analysis. Overall, no significant changes to patients’ A-line appearance were detected, regardless of the time of assessment. There was, however, an increase in the number of B-lines at the screening times of 30 and 60 minutes after induction, as compared to initial assessments (p = 0.011 and p<0.001 respectively), and an increase in the number of positive regions (≥ 3 B-lines) at 30 and 60 minutes after induction and after recovery, as compared to initial assessment (p<0.001; p<0.001 and p = 0.001 respectively). Conclusions: An uneventful anesthesia may predispose to abnormal LUS findings and should be considered while interpreting of LUS results in cases with perioperative pulmonary complications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Krawczyk, P., Jastrzebska, A., Szczeklik, W., & Andres, J. (2021). Perioperative lung ultrasound pattern changes in patients undergoing gynecological procedures — a prospective observational study. Ginekologia Polska, 92(4), 271–277. https://doi.org/10.5603/GP.a2021.0017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free