Review of sustainability assessment approaches based on life cycles

70Citations
Citations of this article
261Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Many different approaches have been developed to quantify and evaluate sustainability. Here a review is performed on sustainability assessment based on Life Cycle Thinking, which mostly means Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA). Until the end of 2018, 258 publications can be found, from which 146 include a case study. The highest number of publications appeared between 2016 and 2018 and, compared to the years before 2016, the number of authors has increased. However, in recent years the focus has been more on case studies than on methodological aspects of LCSA. The presented holistic approaches for LCSA are either too broad or too narrow for scientific guidance. Therefore, many questions concerning LCSA are still open, e.g., regarding definition of sustainability dimensions and the desire or need for multi-criteria decision-analysis. An underlying problem is the lack of discussion about sustainability concepts. The momentum in the community to perform case studies for LCSA should be used to also develop more guiding principles.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wulf, C., Werker, J., Ball, C., Zapp, P., & Kuckshinrichs, W. (2019, October 1). Review of sustainability assessment approaches based on life cycles. Sustainability (Switzerland). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205717

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free