Patterns of interaction-dominant dynamics in individual versus collaborative memory foraging

6Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The extent to which a cognitive system’s behavioral dynamics fit a power law distribution is considered indicative of the extent to which that system’s behavior is driven by multiplicative, interdependent interactions between its components. Here, we investigate the dynamics of memory processes in individual and collaborating participants. Collaborative dyads showed the characteristic collaborative inhibition effect when compared to nominal groups in terms of the number of items retrieved in a categorical recall task, but they also generate qualitatively different patterns of search behavior. To categorize search behavior, we used multi-model inference to compare the degree to which five candidate models (normal, exponential, gamma, lognormal, and Pareto) described the temporal distribution of each individual and dyad’s recall processes. All individual and dyad recall processes were best fit by interaction-dominant distributions (lognormal and Pareto), but a clear difference emerged in that individual behavior is more power law, and collaborative behavior was more lognormal. We discuss these results in terms of the cocktail model (Holden et al. in Psychol Rev 116(2):318–342, 2009), which suggests that as a task becomes more constrained (such as through the necessity of collaborating), behavior can shift from power law to lognormal. This shift may reflect a decrease in the dyad’s ability to flexibly shift between perseverative and explorative search patterns. Finally, our results suggest that a fruitful avenue for future research would be to investigate the constraints modulating the shift from power law to lognormal behavior in collaborative memory search.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Szary, J., Dale, R., Kello, C. T., & Rhodes, T. (2015). Patterns of interaction-dominant dynamics in individual versus collaborative memory foraging. Cognitive Processing, 16(4), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0731-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free