Validation of refined numerical modeling for existing RC buildings: Comparison between predicted and observed earthquake damage

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A reliable estimation of the seismic performances of existing reinforced concrete building is of paramount importance to design proper retrofit solutions. Number of refined numerical models are nowadays available, nevertheless predicting the seismic performance and the earthquake damage at component level is still a challenging task. Marked nonlinear phenomena, strength and stiffness degradation and pinching affect the cyclic behavior of structural members designed with reinforcement details non-conforming with current seismic codes. This, along with the interaction between the bare frame and the stiff infills, makes complex the reproduction of the global structural behavior. This study focuses on a refined modeling procedure properly developed for existing RC frames. The modeling assumptions, the hysteresis assigned to the different building components and the modeling strategy accounting for the infill contribution are presented and discussed. The model validation at component and building level related to case-study buildings damaged by the L'Aquila (2009) earthquake is presented. A component-by-component comparison between predicted and observed damage is shown. The proposed numerical model and the in-depth discussion on the earthquake damage are useful to identify the building weaknesses, estimate the repair costs and design proper retrofit solutions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Del Vecchio, C., Di Ludovico, M., Pampanin, S., & Prota, A. (2017). Validation of refined numerical modeling for existing RC buildings: Comparison between predicted and observed earthquake damage. In COMPDYN 2017 - Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (Vol. 2, pp. 2792–2804). National Technical University of Athens. https://doi.org/10.7712/120117.5607.17852

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free