Comparison of Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Status between Core Needle Biopsy and Surgical Specimens of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: Pembrolizumab is currently used to treat advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and high-risk early TNBC with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) level and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status are predictors of response to NAC and immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. We aimed to investigate whether the PD-L1 status in core needle biopsies (CNBs) could represent the whole tumor in TNBC. Materials and Methods: A total of 49 patients diagnosed with TNBC who received upfront surgery without NAC between January 2018 and March 2021 were included. The PD-L1 expression (SP142 and 22C3 clones) and TIL were evaluated in paired CNBs and resected specimens. The concordance PD-L1 status and TIL levels between CNBs and resected specimens were analyzed. Results: PD-L1 positivity was more frequently observed in resected specimens. The overall reliability of TIL level in the CNB was good [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.847, p<0.001]. The agreements of PD-L1 status were good and fair, respectively (SP142, κ=0.503, p<0.001; 22C3, κ=0.380, p=0.010). As the core number of CNB increased, the reliability and agreement also im-proved, especially from five tumor cores (TIL, ICC=0.911, p<0.001; PD-L1 [22C3], κ=0.750, p=0.028). Regarding PD-L1 (SP142), no further improvement was observed with ≥5 tumor cores (κ=0.600, p=0.058). Conclusion: CNBs with ≥5 tumor cores were sufficient to represent the TIL level and PD-L1 (22C3) status in TNBC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Choi, H., Ahn, S. G., Bae, S. J., Kim, J. H., Eun, N. L., Lee, Y., … Cha, Y. J. (2023). Comparison of Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Status between Core Needle Biopsy and Surgical Specimens of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Yonsei Medical Journal, 64(8), 518–525. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2023.0090

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free