Recommendations for Evaluating the Validity of Quality of Life Claims for Labeling and Promotion

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
151Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The pharmaceutical industry, the medical device industry, and national regulatory agencies such as the United States Food and Drug Administration (PDA) are faced with a number of difficult issues related to the development and evaluation of health-related quality of life (HRQL) claims for product labeling and promotion. This paper outlines some of the unique challenges of HRQL research and makes recommendations for assur- ing that claims are based on the results of rigorous studies designed and conducted according to accepted scientific principles and practices. Standards of evidence for HRQL are discussed in terms of research design and methodology, instrumentation, statistical analysis, and interpretation. Examples are provided to highlight important points. The paper concludes with a brief discussion of future trends in HRQL outcomes evaluation.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leidy, N. K., Revicki, D. A., & Genesté, B. (1999). Recommendations for Evaluating the Validity of Quality of Life Claims for Labeling and Promotion. Value in Health, 2(2), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-4733.1999.02210.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 51

57%

Researcher 23

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 11

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 37

49%

Psychology 18

24%

Nursing and Health Professions 13

17%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free