Is Ritonavir-Boosted Atazanavir a Risk for Cholelithiasis Compared to Other Protease Inhibitors?

10Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective:To compare the incidence of complicated cholelithiasis in patients receiving ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV/r)- containing antiretroviral therapy with those on other protease inhibitors (PIs).Design:We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients who started either ritonavir-boosted ATV/r- or other PIs (ritonavir-boosted fosamprenavir, unboosted fosamprenavir, lopinavir/ritonavir, and ritonavir-boosted darunavir) -containing antiretroviral therapy.Methods:The incidence of complicated cholelithiasis was determined in each group. Complicated cholelithiasis was defined as follows: 1) cholelithiasis complicated by cholecystitis, cholangitis, or pancreatitis or 2) symptomatic cholelithiasis or choledocholithiasis which required invasive procedures such as cholecystomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The effects of ATV/r were estimated by univariate and multivariate Cox hazards models as the primary exposure.Results:Complicated cholelithiasis was diagnosed in 3 patients (2.23 per 1000 person-years) in the ATV/r group (n = 466), and 3 (1.64 per 1000 person-years) in the other PIs group (n = 776), respectively. The incidence was not statistically different in the two groups by log-rank test (P = 0.702). By univariate and multivariate analysis adjusted for age and body weight, ATV/r use was not associated with cholelithiasis. (HR = 1.365; 95% CI, 0.275-6.775; p = 0.704) (adjusted HR = 1.390; 95% CI, 0.276-7.017; p = 0.690). For the 3 patients who developed cholelithiasis in the ATV/r group, the time to the diagnosis of cholelithiasis was 18, 34, and 39 months, respectively.Conclusion:In this study, the incidence of complicated cholelithiasis was low and was not different between patients on ATV/r and those on other PIs. On the contrary to ATV/r-associated nephrolithiasis, the possible risk of cholelithiasis should not preclude the use of ATV/r. © 2013 Hamada et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hamada, Y., Nishijima, T., Komatsu, H., Teruya, K., Gatanaga, H., Kikuchi, Y., & Oka, S. (2013). Is Ritonavir-Boosted Atazanavir a Risk for Cholelithiasis Compared to Other Protease Inhibitors? PLoS ONE, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069845

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free