Mathematical minerals: A history of petrophysical petrography

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The quantitative estimation of mineralogy from wireline petrophysical logs began as an analytical stepchild. The calculation of porosity in reservoir lithologies is affected by mineral variability, and methods were developed to eliminate these components. Simple inversion methods were applied in pioneer applications by mainframe computers to a limited suite of digital log data. Over time, the value of lithological characterization of reservoirs and resource plays has been recognized. At the same time, the introduction of newer petrophysical measurements, particularly geochemical logs, in conjunction with increasingly sophisticated algorithms, has increased confidence in mineral profiles from logs as a routine evaluation tool.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Doveton, J. H. (2018). Mathematical minerals: A history of petrophysical petrography. In Handbook of Mathematical Geosciences: Fifty Years of IAMG (pp. 467–481). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78999-6_24

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free