Preoperative or postoperative diclofenac for laparoscopic tuballigation

48Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We have compared the analgesic effects of diclofenac given before operation or immediately after operation in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study of 40 healthy female patients under going laparoscopic tuballigation. Group 1 patients received diclofenac 75 mg as a 3-ml i.m. injection 1-2 h before operation and normal saline 3 ml i.m. immediately after surgery. Group 2 patients received normal saline 3 ml i.m. before operation and diclofenac 75 mg i.m. immediately after surgery. Outcome measures were patients' perception of pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS), verbal response scale (VRS), the number of patients who required postoperative morphine, time to first post-operative morphine injection and total dose of morphine given. VAS at 30 mm and at 1, 3 and 6 h after operation were, respectively (median, interquartile range) 4.5 (2.3-6.0) vs 5.3 (2.8-7.8); 3.3 (2.3-5.0) vs 4.4 (3.0-5.8); 1.4 (0-2.3) vs 1.9 (0.8-3.0); 0.5 (0-1) vs 0.7 (0-1.3), (ns). VRS at 1 and 3 h after operation were, respectively, (median, interquartile range) 2.2 (1.5-3.0) vs 2.7 (2.0-4.0) and 0.8 (0-1.3) vs 0.9 (0-1.5) (ns). Sixteen patients in group 1 compared with 17 in group 2 required postoperative morphine. Time to first morphine administration and dose given were, respectively, (median, interquartile range) 50.6 (39-60) min vs 35.7 (20-49) min (P = 0.1) and 9.0 (5-10) mg vs 9.5 (7.5-10) (P - 0.9). We conclude that in patients presenting for laparoscopic tubal ligation, preoperative administration of diclofenac 75 mg i.m. conferred no additional analgesic benefit compared with a similar dose given after operation. © 1994 British Journal of Anaesthesia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Buggy, D. J., Wall, C., & Carton, E. G. (1994). Preoperative or postoperative diclofenac for laparoscopic tuballigation. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 73(6), 767–770. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/73.6.767

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free