Finding a Rule-Based Solution to the Appellate Body Crisis: Looking beyond the Multiparty Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement

12Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The WTO dispute settlement system is in crisis due to the persistent blockage of the appointment of Appellate Body members by the United States. This paper reviews the US criticisms against the Appellate Body and argues that its allegations are unfounded and its approach is wrong. To deal with the US blockage, various proposals have been made, with the most popular being the Multiparty Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA) set up by several key Members including the European Union and China. After a thorough analysis of the key features of the MPIA from both theoretical and practical perspectives, this paper argues that the MPIA fails to provide a proper solution to the Appellate Body crisis due to its many defects. Instead, the paper suggests the appointment of Appellate Body members based on majority voting at the General Council. This paper concludes by noting that only such a rule-based solution can not only solve the current Appellate Body crisis but also deter similar attempts to sabotage the WTO dispute settlement system in the future.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gao, H. (2021). Finding a Rule-Based Solution to the Appellate Body Crisis: Looking beyond the Multiparty Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement. Journal of International Economic Law, 24(3), 534–550. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgab031

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free