Reining in the Web's Inconsistencies with Site Policy

Abstract

Over the years, browsers have adopted an ever-increasing number of client-enforced security policies deployed through HTTP headers. Such mechanisms are fundamental for web application security, and usually deployed on a per-page basis. This, however, enables inconsistencies, as different pages within the same security boundaries (in form of origins or sites) can express conflicting security requirements. In this paper, we formalize inconsistencies for cookie security attributes, CSP, and HSTS, and then quantify the magnitude and impact of inconsistencies at scale by crawling 15, 000 popular sites. We show that numerous sites endanger their own security by omission or misconfiguration of the aforementioned mechanisms, which lead to unnecessary exposure to XSS, cookie theft, and HSTS deactivation. We then use our data to analyse to which extent the recent Origin Policy proposal can fix the problem of inconsistencies. Unfortunately, we conclude that the current Origin Policy design suffers from major shortcomings which limit its practical applicability to address security inconsistencies while catering to the need of real-world sites. Based on these insights, we propose Site Policy, designed to overcome Origin Policy's shortcomings and make any insecurity explicit. We make a prototype implementation of Site Policy publicly available, along with a supporting toolchain for initial policy generation, security analysis, and test deployment.