Maximum of marginal likelihood criterion instead of cross-validation for designing of artificial neural networks

6Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The cross-validation method is commonly applied in the design of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs). In the paper the design of ANN is related to searching for an optimal value of the regularization coefficient or the number of neurons in the hidden layer of network. Instead of the cross-validation procedure, the Maximum of Marginal Likelihood (MML) criterion, taken from Bayesian approach, can be used. The MML criterion, applied to searching for the optimal values of design parameters of neural networks, is illustrated on two examples. The obtained results enable us to formulate conclusions that the MML criterion can be used instead of the cross-validation method (especially for small data sets), since it permits the design of ANNs without formulation of a validation set of patterns. © 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Waszczyszyn, Z., & Słoński, M. (2008). Maximum of marginal likelihood criterion instead of cross-validation for designing of artificial neural networks. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5097 LNAI, pp. 186–194). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69731-2_19

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free