Background: There is a growing incidence of foot injuries in basketball, which may be from the sport’s repetitive, forceful multi-directional demands. Modifying midsole stiffness of the basketball shoe has been reported to alter ankle motion and plantar forces to reduce the risk of injury; however, the effects on anatomical, in-shoe foot (metatarsal), motion is not well understood. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify differences in foot and ankle biomechanics between basketball shoes with differing midsole stiffness values during single-leg jump landings. It was hypothesized that a stiffer midsole would elicit lower 1st metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) dorsiflexion angles, higher ankle dorsiflexion angles, and higher plantar forces and relative loading in the distal foot. Study Design: Experimental cross-sectional study. Methods: Twenty high school and collegiate-aged basketball players performed a single-leg side drop jump and a single-leg cross drop jump in a pair of standard basketball shoes and a pair of shoes modified with a fiberglass plate to increase midsole stiffness. Three-dimensional motion analysis and flexible insoles quantified foot and ankle kinematics and plantar force distribution, respectively. Separate 2 (footwear) x 2 (task) repeated measures ANOVA models were used to analyze differences in 1) ankle kinematics, 2) 1st metatarsophalangeal kinematics, 3) maximal regional plantar forces, and 4) relative load. Results: The stiffer shoe elicited decreased peak ankle plantarflexion (mean difference=5.8°, p=0.01) and eversion (mean difference=6.6°, p=0.03) and increased peak ankle dorsiflexion angles (mean difference=5.0°, p=0.008) but no differences were observed in 1st MTPJ motion (p>0.05). The stiffer shoe also resulted in lower peak plantar forces (mean difference=24.2N, p=0.004) and relative load (mean difference=1.9%, p=0.001) under the lesser toes. Conclusions: Altering the midsole stiffness in basketball shoes did not reduce motion at the MTPJ, indicating that added stiffness may reduce shoe motion, but does not reduce in-shoe anatomical motion. Instead, a stiffer midsole elicits other changes, including additional ankle joint motion and a reduction in plantar forces under the lesser toes. Collectively, this indicates that clinicians need to account for unintended compensations that can occur throughout the kinetic chain when altering a shoe property to alleviate a musculoskeletal injury. Level of Evidence: 2b.
CITATION STYLE
Taylor, J. B., Nguyen, A. D., Parry, H. A., Zuk, E. F., Stewart Pritchard, N., & Ford, K. R. (2019). MODIFYING MIDSOLE STIFFNESS OF BASKETBALL FOOTWEAR AFFECTS FOOT AND ANKLE BIOMECHANICS. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 14(3), 359–367. https://doi.org/10.26603/ijspt20190359
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.