Targeted melanoma prevention intervention: A cluster randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Purpose: Targeted interventions to reduce the risk and increase the early detection of melanoma have the potential to save lives. We aimed to assess the effect of such an intervention on patient prevention behavior. Methods: We conducted a pilot clustered randomized controlled trial, comparing a targeted screening and education intervention with a conventional information- based campaign in 20 private surgeries in western France. In the intervention group, 10 general practitioners identified patients at elevated risk for melanoma with a validated assessment tool, the Self-Assessment Melanoma Risk Score (SAMScore), examined their skin, and counseled them using information leaflets. In the control group, 10 general practitioners displayed a poster and the leaflets in their waiting room and examined patients' skin at their own discretion. The main outcome measures were sunbathing and skin self-examinations among patients at elevated risk, assessed 5 months later with a questionnaire. Results: Analyses were based on 173 patients. Compared with control patients, intervention patients were more likely to remember the campaign (81.4% vs 50.0%, P =.0001) and to correctly identify their elevated risk of melanoma (71.1% vs 42.1%, P =.001). Furthermore, intervention patients had higher levels of prevention behaviors: they were less likely to sunbathe in the summer (24.7% vs 40.8%, P =.048) and more likely to have performed skin self-examinations in the past year (52.6% vs 36.8%, P =.029). The intervention was not associated with any clear adverse effects, although there were trends whereby intervention patients were more likely to worry about melanoma and to consult their general practitioner again about the disease. Conclusions: The combination of use of the SAMScore and general practitioner examination and counseling during consultations is an efficient way to promote patient behaviors that may reduce melanoma risk. Extending the duration of follow- up and demonstrating an impact on morbidity and mortality remain major issues for further research. © 2014 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.