Design and Experimental Assessment of Variable-Geometry Dies for Polymer Extrusion

6Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper presents a design methodology and experimental assessment of variable-geometry dies that enable the extrusion of plastic parts with a nonconstant cross section. These shape-changing dies can produce complex plastic components at higher manufacturing speeds and with lower tooling costs than injection molding. Planar, rigid-body, shape-changing mechanism synthesis techniques are used to create the links that comprise the variable-geometry die exit orifice. Mechanical design guidelines for production-worthy dies are proposed. Several dies were designed and constructed to provide significant changes in the cross-sectional shape and area of extruded parts. Experiments were conducted in a production environment. An analysis of the repeatability of the cross-sectional profiles along the length of the part is presented.

References Powered by Scopus

Review of die lip buildup in plastics extrusion

56Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Kinematic synthesis of planar, shape-changing rigid-body mechanisms

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Thermoplastics and thermoplastic composites: Technical information for plastics users

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Shape-changing chains for morphometric analysis of 2D and 3D, open or closed outlines

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Synthesizing Mechanical Chains for Morphing between Spatial Curves

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A BACKBONE-DRIVEN APPROACH FOR THE POSITIONING OF CONTINUUM ROBOTS

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, B., Myszka, D. H., & Murray, A. P. (2018). Design and Experimental Assessment of Variable-Geometry Dies for Polymer Extrusion. Journal of Mechanical Design, 140(1). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038297

Readers over time

‘17‘19‘21‘22‘23‘2400.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 2

33%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

33%

Researcher 2

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 4

67%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

17%

Materials Science 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0