Conviviality Vis-à-Vis Cosmopolitanism and Creolisation: Probing the Concepts

2Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The introductory chapter discusses conviviality in relation to the adjoining concepts cosmopolitanism and creolisation. Inspired by the Spanish term convivencia, Ivan Illich envisioned a post-industrial convivial society of “autonomous individuals and primary groups” (Illich 1973), which resembles present-day manifestations of “convivialism”. Paul Gilroy refashioned conviviality as a substitute for cosmopolitanism, denoting an ability to be ‘at ease’ in contexts of diversity (Gilroy 2004). Rather than replacing one concept with the other, this book seeks to explore the interconnections-commonalities and differences-between them. The urgency of today’s global predicament is the recurring argument in the discussion of all three concepts, and a further reason to bring them in dialogue. Whereas conviviality and cosmopolitanism are already tightly intertwined, creolisation is arguably a necessary complement to the other two.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hemer, O., Frykman, M. P., & Ristilammi, P. M. (2019). Conviviality Vis-à-Vis Cosmopolitanism and Creolisation: Probing the Concepts. In Conviviality at the Crossroads: The Poetics and Politics of Everyday Encounters (pp. 1–14). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28979-9_1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free