Aneurysm wall thickness measurements of experimental aneurysms: In vivo high-field MR imaging versus direct microscopy

10Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Thin cerebral aneurysm wall thickness (AWT) is connected to high aneurysm rupture risk. MR imaging of AWT leads to overestimations. The aim of the present study was to quantify MR inaccuracy by comparison with accurate light microscopic measurements. Methods: In 13 experimental microsurgical bifurcation aneurysms in rabbits, 3 Tesla (3 T)-MR imaging using contrast- enhanced T1 Flash sequences (resolution: 0.4 × 0.4 × 1.5 mm3) was performed. The aneurysms were retrieved immediately after MR acquisition, cut longitudinally, and calibrated photographs were obtained. AWT (dome, neck) and parent vessel thickness (PVT) were measured on the MR images and microscopic photographs by independent investigators. All parameters were statistically compared (Wilcoxon test, Spearman correlation). Results: AWT and PVT could be imaged and measured in all aneurysms with good quality. Comparison with the “real” light microscopic measurements showed a progressive tendency of MR AWT overestimation with smaller AWT: AWT at the dome (0.24 ± 0.06 mm vs. MR 0.30 ± 0.08 mm; p = 0.0078; R = 0.6125), AWT at the neck (0.25 ± 0.07 mm vs. MR 0.29 ± 0.07 mm; p = 0.0469; R = 0.7451), and PVT (0.46 ± 0.06 mm vs. MR 0.48 ± 0.06 mm; p = 0.5; R = 0.8568). Conclusion: In this experimental setting, 3 T-MR imaging of cerebral AWT showed unacceptable inaccuracies only below the image resolution threshold. Theoretically, AWT for clinical usage could be classifi ed in ranges, defi ned by the maximum image resolution.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sherif, C., Kleinpeter, G., Loyoddin, M., Mach, G., Plasenzotti, R., Haider, T., … Krssak, M. (2015). Aneurysm wall thickness measurements of experimental aneurysms: In vivo high-field MR imaging versus direct microscopy. Acta Neurochirurgica, Supplementum, 120, 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04981-6_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free