External-beam radiotherapy for localized or locally advanced prostate cancer in Japan: A multi-institutional outcome analysis

7Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The outcomes of patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer treated with external-beam radiotherapy are not well known in Japan. Methods: Thirty-four institutions combined data on 679 patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer treated with a total dose ≥60 Gy between 1995 and 2002. Results: With a median follow-up of 46 months, the 5-year overall, clinical progression-free, and biochemical relapse-free survival rate were 93.0, 95.3 and 71.9% for all patients, respectively. The 5-year progression-free, and biochemical relapse-free survival rates according to the risk group were 100%, 90.8% in the low-risk group, 98.3%, 75.7% in the intermediate-risk group and 93.6%;, 67.6% in the high-risk group, respectively. The multivariate analysis for biochemical relapse-free survival revealed that prostate-specific antigen (relative risk, 1.002; 95% CI, 1.001-1.003; P = 0.0041), Gleason score (relative risk, 1.166; 95% CI, 1.046-1.302; P = 0.0055), T classification (relative risk, 2.897; 95% CI, 1.999-4.230; P = 0.0000), pelvic irradiation (relative risk, 2.042; 95% CI, 1.328-3.273; P = 0.0008), and androgen abletion (relative risk, 0.321; 95% CI, 0.240-0.427; P = 0.0000) were significant prognostic factors. Only 1.1% of patients experienced late morbidity of Grade 3. Conclusion: Radiotherapy for prostate cancer seemed to be effective, with little risk of normal tissue complications. © The Author (2008). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nakamura, K., Mizowaki, T., Imada, H., Karasawa, K., Uno, T., Onishi, H., … Akimoto, T. (2008). External-beam radiotherapy for localized or locally advanced prostate cancer in Japan: A multi-institutional outcome analysis. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 38(3), 200–204. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyn008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free