Assessing community health workers’ time allocation for a cervical cancer screening and treatment intervention in Malawi: a time and motion study

2Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Community health workers (CHWs) are essential field-based personnel and increasingly used to deliver priority interventions to achieve universal health coverage. Existing literature allude to the potential for detrimental effects of multi-tasking CHWs. This study objective was to assess the impact of integrating cervical cancer screening and prevention therapy (CCSPT) with family planning (FP) on time utilization among CHWs. Methods: A time and motion study was conducted in 7 health facilities in Malawi. Data was collected at baseline between October-July 2019, and 12 months after CCSPT implementation between July and August 2021. CHWs trained to deliver CCSPT were continuously observed in real time while their activities were timed by independent observers. We used paired sample t-test to assess pre-post differences in average hours CHWs spent on the following key activities, before and after CCSPT implementation: clinical and preventive care; administration; FP; and non-work-related tasks. Regression models were used to ascertain impact of CCSPT on average durations CHWs spent on key activities. Results: Thirty-seven (n = 37) CHWs were observed. Their mean age and years of experience were 42 and 17, respectively. Overall, CHWs were observed for 323 hours (inter quartile range: 2.8–5.5). Compared with the period before CCSPT, the proportion of hours CHWs spent on clinical and preventive care, administration and non-work-related activities were reduced by 13.7, 8.7 and 34.6%, respectively. CHWs spent 75% more time on FP services after CCSPT integration relative to the period before CCSPT. The provision of CCSPT resulted in less time that CHWs devoted towards clinical and preventive care but this reduction was not significant. Following CCPST, CHWs spent significantly few hours on non-work-related activities. Conclusion: Introduction of CCSPT was not very detrimental to pre-existing community services. CHWs managed their time ensuring additional efforts required for CCSPT were not at the expense of essential activities. The programming and policy implications are that multi-tasking CHWs with CCSPT will not have substantial opportunity costs.

References Powered by Scopus

Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: New concepts are needed to study research participation effects

1732Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What do we know about community-based health worker programs? A systematic review of existing reviews on community health workers

406Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effectiveness of community health workers delivering preventive interventions for maternal and child health in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review

307Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A time-motion study of community health workers delivering community-based primary health care in Neno District, Malawi

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Results from Two HPV-Based Cervical Cancer Screening-Family Planning Integration Models in Malawi: A Cluster Randomized Trial

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chinkhumba, J., Low, D., Ziphondo, E., Msowoya, L., Rao, D., Smith, J. S., … Tang, J. H. (2022). Assessing community health workers’ time allocation for a cervical cancer screening and treatment intervention in Malawi: a time and motion study. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08577-z

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

44%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

22%

Researcher 2

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 5

45%

Chemistry 2

18%

Social Sciences 2

18%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

18%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free