Semi-automated myocardial segmentation of bright blood multi-gradient echo images improves reproducibility of myocardial contours and T2* determination

3Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: Early detection of iron loading is affected by the reproducibility of myocardial contour assessment. A novel semi-automatic myocardial segmentation method is presented on contrast-optimized composite images and compared to the results of manual drawing. Materials and methods: Fifty-one short-axis slices at basal, mid-ventricular and apical locations from 17 patients were acquired by bright blood multi-gradient echo MRI. Four observers produced semi-automatic and manual myocardial contours on contrast-optimized composite images. The semi-automatic segmentation method relies on vector field convolution active contours to generate the endocardial contour. After creating radial pixel clusters on the myocardial wall, a combination of pixel-wise coefficient of variance (CoV) assessment and k-means clustering establishes the epicardial contour for each segment. Results: Compared to manual drawing, semi-automatic myocardial segmentation lowers the variability of T2* quantification within and between observers (CoV of 12.05 vs. 13.86% and 14.43 vs. 16.01%) by improving contour reproducibility (P < 0.001). In the presence of iron loading, semi-automatic segmentation also lowers the T2* variability within and between observers (CoV of 13.14 vs. 15.19% and 15.91 vs. 17.28%). Conclusion: Application of semi-automatic myocardial segmentation on contrast-optimized composite images improves the reproducibility of T2* quantification.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Triadyaksa, P., Prakken, N. H. J., Overbosch, J., Peters, R. B., van Swieten, J. M., Oudkerk, M., & Sijens, P. E. (2017). Semi-automated myocardial segmentation of bright blood multi-gradient echo images improves reproducibility of myocardial contours and T2* determination. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 30(3), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-016-0601-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free