Supporting Creativity in Engineering Design: A Position Paper

1Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Within this paper it is not the aim to explain the mechanisms of creativity, possibilities to measure creativity or to deliver a definition. Based on some experience based on personal involvement and a large number of case studies some conclusions will be presented. There are also a few critical remarks concerning creativity related practice as well as research. Creativity is a very complex topic! A differentiation between different kinds of creativity is required as well as an understanding of the dependencies between problem, situation, acting people as a minimum. Based on that a preliminary model may be established, which should serve formulating hypotheses for further empirical research. The outcome of this research may help to improve the model. Creativity is not just inspiration; it is hard work and should be supported by systematic procedures and methods.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lindemann, U. (2014). Supporting Creativity in Engineering Design: A Position Paper. In Principia Designae – Pre-Design, Design, and Post-Design: Social Motive for the Highly Advanced Technological Society (pp. 17–24). Springer Japan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54403-6_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free