Current status of simulation training in urology: A non-systematic review

27Citations
Citations of this article
88Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Simulation has emerged as an effective solution to increasing modern constraints in surgical training. It is recognized that a larger proportion of surgical complications occur during the surgeon’s initial learning curve. The simulation takes the learning curve out of the operating theatre and facilitates training in a safe and pressure-free environment whilst focusing on patient safety. The cost of simulation is not insignificant and requires commitment in funding, human resources and logistics. It is therefore important for trainers to have evidence when selecting various simulators or devices. Our non-systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive up-to-date picture on urology simulators and the evidence for their validity. It also discusses emerging technologies and future directions. Urologists should embed evidence-based simulation in training programs to shorten learning curves while maintaining patient safety and work should be directed toward a validated and agreed curriculum.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kozan, A. A., Chan, L. H., & Biyani, C. S. (2020). Current status of simulation training in urology: A non-systematic review. Research and Reports in Urology. Dove Medical Press Ltd. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S237808

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free