Conversations with AutoTutor Help Students Learn

161Citations
Citations of this article
198Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

AutoTutor helps students learn by holding a conversation in natural language. AutoTutor is adaptive to the learners' actions, verbal contributions, and in some systems their emotions. Many of AutoTutor's conversation patterns simulate human tutoring, but other patterns implement ideal pedagogies that open the door to computer tutors eclipsing human tutors in learning gains. Indeed, current versions of AutoTutor yield learning gains on par with novice and expert human tutors. This article selectively highlights the status of AutoTutor's dialogue moves, learning gains, implementation challenges, differences between human and ideal tutors, and some of the systems that evolved from AutoTutor. Current and future AutoTutor projects are investigating three-party conversations, called trialogues, where two agents (such as a tutor and student) interact with the human learner.

References Powered by Scopus

The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems

1091Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Confusion can be beneficial for learning

559Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one‐to‐one tutoring

405Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Chatbots applications in education: A systematic review

405Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT

341Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Advancing the Science of Collaborative Problem Solving

262Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Graesser, A. C. (2016). Conversations with AutoTutor Help Students Learn. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(1), 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0086-4

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 84

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 17

14%

Researcher 17

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 53

51%

Social Sciences 32

31%

Psychology 11

11%

Arts and Humanities 7

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free