Correction: Defining the minimally clinically important difference of the SF-36 physical function subscale for paediatric CFS/ME: triangulation using three different methods (Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, (2018), 16, 1, (202), 10.1186/s12955-018-1028-2)

Amberly Brigden; Roxanne M. Parslow; Daisy Gaunt; Simon M. Collin; Andy Jones; Esther Crawley

ArticleOPEN ACCESS

Correction: Defining the minimally clinically important difference of the SF-36 physical function subscale for paediatric CFS/ME: triangulation using three different methods (Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, (2018), 16, 1, (202), 10.1186/s12955-018-1028-2)

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

DOI: 10.1186/s12955-022-02078-7

0Citations

1Readers

Abstract

The original article [1] required an amendment to the Quantitative Data statement in the Ethics Declarations section. The statement has since been updated.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brigden, A., Parslow, R. M., Gaunt, D., Collin, S. M., Jones, A., & Crawley, E. (2023, December 1). Correction: Defining the minimally clinically important difference of the SF-36 physical function subscale for paediatric CFS/ME: triangulation using three different methods (Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, (2018), 16, 1, (202), 10.1186/s12955-018-1028-2). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-022-02078-7

Correction: Defining the minimally clinically important difference of the SF-36 physical function subscale for paediatric CFS/ME: triangulation using three different methods (Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, (2018), 16, 1, (202), 10.1186/s12955-018-1028-2)

Abstract

Cite

Register to see more suggestions