The development of computerised success-failure manipulation paradigms for the experimental study of metacognition in neurological patients

3Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Research into metacognitive abilities of clinical populations has indicated pervasive deficits in terms of monitoring of cognitive performance. Nevertheless, there are important methodological issues regarding the validity of these findings. In the current paper, we describe the development of novel experimental procedures to mitigate some of these limitations. Specifically, we report the creation of computerised tasks based on success-failure manipulation (SFM), which allow experimental control over the performance of participants. We discuss the theoretical implications of this new procedure and also results obtained so far with the tasks. Finally, we present future research directions stemming from the use of the tasks.

References Powered by Scopus

Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry

6135Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation

4674Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

FAILURE TO ESCAPE TRAUMATIC SHOCK

1221Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Mood-congruent recollection and anosognosia in Alzheimer's disease

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Implicit Behavioral Change in Response to Cognitive Tasks in Alzheimer Disease

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

ADReFV: Face video dataset based on human-computer interaction for Alzheimer's disease recognition

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mograbi, D. C., Brown, R. G., Brand, A., & Morris, R. G. (2014). The development of computerised success-failure manipulation paradigms for the experimental study of metacognition in neurological patients. Temas Em Psicologia, 22(3), 579–588. https://doi.org/10.9788/TP2014.3-04

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

78%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 4

50%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

25%

Computer Science 1

13%

Chemistry 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free