HTN problem spaces: Structure, algorithms, termination

30Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

For HTN planning, we formally characterize and classify four kinds of problem spaces in which each node represents a planning problem or subproblem. Two of the problem spaces are searched by current HTN planning algorithms; the other two problem spaces are new. This enables us to provide: Sufficient (and in one case, necessary) conditions for finiteness of each kind of problem space. The conditions can be evaluated up-front to see if an HTN planning problem is finite. Loop-detection tests that can be used in HTN planners to ensure termination when the problem space is finite. A way to compute the correct value for an upper-bound parameter in an HTN-to-PDDL translation algorithm published in IJCAI-2009. Planning algorithms that utilize the two new problem spaces to guarantee termination on broader classes of planning problems than previous HTN planning algorithms. Copyright © 2012, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

SHOP2: An HTN planning system

743Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Complexity, decidability and undecidability results for domain-independent planning

125Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On the decidability of HTN planning with task insertion

90Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

HTN planning: Overview, comparison, and beyond

118Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A survey on hierarchical planning - One abstract idea, many concrete realizations

68Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Tight bounds for HTN planning

46Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alford, R., Shivashankar, V., Kuter, U., & Nau, D. (2012). HTN problem spaces: Structure, algorithms, termination. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Search, SoCS 2012 (pp. 2–9). https://doi.org/10.1609/socs.v3i1.18239

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

70%

Researcher 2

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 8

73%

Decision Sciences 1

9%

Physics and Astronomy 1

9%

Materials Science 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free