Neutrophil CD64 expression as a diagnostic marker for sepsis in adult patients: A meta-analysis

88Citations
Citations of this article
89Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Neutrophil CD64 (nCD64) expression appears to be a promising marker of bacterial infections. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the accuracy of nCD64 expression for the diagnosis of sepsis in critically ill adult patients. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, ISI Web of Knowledge, and the Cochrane Library for literature published between database inception and 19 May 2014, as well as reference lists of identified primary studies. Studies were included if they included assessment of the accuracy of nCD64 expression for sepsis diagnosis in adult patients and provided sufficient information to construct a 2×2 contingency table. Results: A total of 8 studies comprising 1986 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the final analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.76 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.78) and 0.85 (95 % CI, 0.82-0.87), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio were 8.15 (95 % CI, 3.82-17.36), 0.16 (95 % CI, 0.09-0.30), and 60.41 (95 % CI, 15.87-229.90), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve of nCD64 expression with Q* value were 0.95 (Q* =0.89). Conclusions: On the basis of our meta-analysis, nCD64 expression is a helpful marker for early diagnosis of sepsis in critically ill patients. The results of the test should not be used alone to diagnose sepsis, but instead should be interpreted in combination with medical history, physical examination, and other test results.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, X., Li, Z. Y., Zeng, L., Zhang, A. Q., Pan, W., Gu, W., & Jiang, J. X. (2015). Neutrophil CD64 expression as a diagnostic marker for sepsis in adult patients: A meta-analysis. Critical Care, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-0972-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free