Implications of probability analysis for interpreting results of leukocyte esterase and nitrite test strips

28Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We examined 288 urine samples, using test strips, sediment microscopy, and culture. The ability of the leukocyte esterase and nitrite test strips to detect or exclude urinary tract infection, as defined by a positive culture, was evaluated by probability analysis. We found that the diagnostic efficiency of the esterase-nitrite combination was similar to that of sediment microscopy. Moreover, once the strip test results had been obtained, little additional information was given by microscopy. The importance of estimating the prevalence, or pre-test probability, of infection before the test result is evaluated is emphasized. We conclude that, for detecting or excluding urinary-tract infection, microscopy can be replaced by the esterase and nitrite test strips. If the probability of infection predicted by the test strips is not high (or low) enough compared with medical decision limits, the samples should be cultured.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bolann, B. J., Sandberg, S., & Digranes, A. (1989). Implications of probability analysis for interpreting results of leukocyte esterase and nitrite test strips. Clinical Chemistry, 35(8), 1663–1668. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/35.8.1663

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free