Analogical argument schemes and complex argumentation

Abstract

This paper addresses several issues in argumentation theory. The over-arching goal is to discuss how a theory of analogical argument schemes fits the pragmadialectical theory of argument schemes and argument structures, and how one should properly reconstruct both single and complex argumentation by analogy. I also propose a unified model that explains how formal valid deductive argumentation relates to argument schemes in general and to analogical argument schemes in particular. The model suggests "scheme-specificvalidity" i.e. that there are contrasting species of validity for each type of argument scheme that derive from one generic conception of validity.