Validation of a second-generation appropriateness classification system for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study

13Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: To test the validity of a second-generation appropriateness system in a cohort of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: We applied the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method to derive our second-generation system and conducted a prospective study of patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis in eight public hospitals in Spain. Main outcome questionnaires were the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Short-Form-12 (SF-12), and the Knee Society Score satisfaction scale (KSS), completed before and 6 months after TKA. Baseline, changes from baseline to 6 months (journey outcome), and 6-month scores (destination outcome) were compared according to appropriateness category. Percentage of patients attaining the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and responders according to Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society (OMERACT-OARSI) criteria were also reported. Results: A total of 282 patients completed baseline and 6-month questionnaires. Of these, 142 (50.4%) were classified as Appropriate, 90 (31.9%) as Uncertain, and 50 (17.7%) as Inappropriate. Patients classified as Appropriate had worse preoperative pain, function, and satisfaction (p < 0.001) and had greater improvements (i.e., journey scores) than those classified as Inappropriate (p < 0.001). At 6 months, destination scores for pain, function, or satisfaction were not significantly different across appropriateness categories. The percentage of patients meeting responder criteria (p < 0.001) and attaining MCID was statistically higher in Appropriate versus Inappropriate groups in pain (p = 0.04) and function (p = 0.004). Conclusions: The validity of our second-generation appropriateness system was generally supported. The findings highlight a critical issue in TKA healthcare: whether TKA appropriateness should be driven by the extent of improvement, by patient final state, or by both.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Escobar, A., Bilbao, A., Bertrand, M. L., Moreta, J., Froufe, M. A., Colomina, J., … Riddle, D. L. (2021). Validation of a second-generation appropriateness classification system for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02371-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free