A k-mismatch string matching for generalized edit distance using diagonal skipping method

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper proposes an approximate string matching with k-mismatches when calculating the generalized edit distance. When the edit distance is generalized, more sophisticated string matching can be provided. However, the execution time increases because of the bundle of complex computations for calculating complicated edit distances. The computational costs for finding which steps or edit distances are over k-mismatches cannot be significant in the generalized edit distance metric. Therefore, we can reduce the execution time by determining steps over k-mismatches and then skipping them. The diagonal step calculations using the pruning register skips unnecessary distance calculations over k-mismatches. The overhead of control statements and reordered memory accesses can be amortized by skipping multiple steps. Even though the proposed skipping method requires additional overhead, the proposed scheme's practical embodiments show that the execution time of string matching is reduced significantly when k is small.

References Powered by Scopus

Error Detecting and Error Correcting Codes

3998Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The String-to-String Correction Problem

2332Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A guided tour to approximate string matching

1944Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Space-efficient computation of parallel approximate string matching

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparison of Computerized and Manual Assessment of Dyslexia Children Test using Text Processing

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, H. J. (2021). A k-mismatch string matching for generalized edit distance using diagonal skipping method. PLoS ONE, 16(5 May). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251047

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘2400.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 1

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 1

50%

Psychology 1

50%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0