The Last Mile Problem: Activists, Advocates, and the Struggle for Justice in Domestic Courts

33Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

The ability of a state to protect its own citizens’ lives is a key part of democratic legitimacy. While the right to physical integrity is nearly universal, holding those who violate this right legally accountable has proved difficult. I argue that the dynamics between civil society groups and government officials can activate investigatory processes plagued by bureaucratic inertia. I develop two analytical categories of civil society actors: Activists impose a political cost to impunity and challenge victim-blaming narratives, whereas advocates facilitate the flow of investigative information between state officials and family members of victims. Drawing from original statistical, ethnographic, and interview evidence, I find that a synergistic political dynamic between activists and advocates can emerge in which political pressure is mounted by activists and channeled into investigatory advances by advocates. While local groups usually anchor these activist–advocate dynamics, international actors may play definitive roles in disrupting tenacious patterns of impunity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gallagher, J. (2017). The Last Mile Problem: Activists, Advocates, and the Struggle for Justice in Domestic Courts. Comparative Political Studies, 50(12), 1666–1698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016688001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free