Too Much, Too Mild, Too Early: Diagnosing the Excessive Expansion of Diagnoses

13Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Tremendous scientific and technological advances have vastly improved diagnostics. At the same time, false alarms, overdiagnosis, medicalization, and overdetection have emerged as pervasive challenges undermining the quality of healthcare and sustainable clinical practice. Despite much attention, there is no clarity on the classification and handling of excessive diagnoses. This article identifies three basic types of excessive diagnosing: too much, too mild, and too early. Correspondingly, it suggests three ways to reduce excess and advance high value care: we must stop diagnosing new phenomena, mild conditions, and early signs that do not give pain, dysfunction, and suffering.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hofmann, B. (2022). Too Much, Too Mild, Too Early: Diagnosing the Excessive Expansion of Diagnoses. International Journal of General Medicine, 15, 6441–6450. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S368541

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free