Clinical evaluation of antimalarial drugs

1Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We have analyzed the clinical data of 189 patients with malaria to establish antimalarial regimens in Japan. The causative parasite species were Plasmodium falciparum in 56 cases (30%), P. vivax in 132 (70%) and P. malariae in 1 (1%). The outcomes f malaria cases are as follows: Cure rats in falciparum and vivax malaria are 86% and 91%, respectively. Two patients died of falciparum malaria and recurrence occurred in 6 cases (11%) of falciparum malaria. Relapse was seen in 12 (9%) of vivax malaria. Chloroquine was most frequently used among antimalarial agents (in 123 cases, 65% of the total) for suppressing acute attacks. The efficacy of chloroquine was evaluated by classifying each case into three groups: chloroquine alone in group one, chloroquine in combination with other antimalarials in group two and other antimalarials except chloroquine in group three. The cure rate among each group is about 80% and there is no difference among them. However, it is noticeable that recurrence occurred when patients were treated with a combination of chloroquine and quinine. We have found a similar result as this in another old report in Japan. Primaquine is effective for eliminating hepatic tissue schizonts but in this study, relapse occurred in 12 cases of vivax, although primaquine had been used in 10 out of 12 cases. In primaquine group, relapse occurred at a similar rate between chloroquine and Fansidar cases. Further studies are needed to decide whether a larger dose of primaquine is appropriate for treatment of vivax malaria. Recovery periods from fever and parasitemia were compared between chloroquine and Fansidar cases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tanabe, K., & Shimada, K. (1990). Clinical evaluation of antimalarial drugs. Kansenshogaku Zasshi. The Journal of the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, 64(6), 668–673. https://doi.org/10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.64.668

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free