The development and validation of the psychological capital questionnaire for patients with Cancer the psychological capital questionnaire

8Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Studies increasingly show that positive psychological constructs affect the mental health of cancer patients. However, most scales that measure hope, resilience, optimism and self-efficacy have been developed based on general populations. The aim of our study was to develop a psychological capital (PsyCap) questionnaire for patients with cancer (PCQ-C) to gauge their mental state more accurately. Methods: The items for the scale were selected by comprehensive literature review and semi-structured interviews, and the relevant terms were screened by an expert panel. A pilot study was then conducted on 202 patients to reduce the item pool, and the reliability and validity of the scale were evaluated using 500 completed questionnaires. The test-retest reliability was then assessed using a subsample of 100 patients. Finally, the completed questionnaires of 229 patients with breast cancer were used to assess the criterion validity of the PCQ-C, including measures of depression and anxiety. Results: Item reduction and exploratory factory analysis resulted in 24 items for self-efficacy, hope, resilience and optimism, accounting for 56.72% of the variance. The Cronbach’s alpha for the scale was 0.886, and the test-retest reliability was 0.825. PsyCap showed a significant negative correlation with both depression (r = − 0.631, P < 0.01) and anxiety (r = − 0.601, P < 0.01). Conclusion: The PCQ-C can objectively evaluate PsyCap in cancer patients and exhibits good psychometric properties.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cui, C. Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Chen, S., Jiang, N., & Wang, L. (2021). The development and validation of the psychological capital questionnaire for patients with Cancer the psychological capital questionnaire. BMC Cancer, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08960-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free