Racially Polarised Partisanship and the Obama Presidency

  • Johnson R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Many commentators described the election of Barack Obama in 2008 as a moment in which voters put aside race and voted for president on a non-racial basis. This account of ‘colour-blind’ electoral politics contrasts sharply with lingering racial divisions in American society. This chapter sets out to reconcile this apparent paradox, arguing that Obama’s election and reelection were, in fact, not ‘colour-blind’ moments but represented the most racially polarised elections in recent US history. Relatedly, this chapter confronts commentators who have argued that Obama’s relative silence on racial matters is a demonstration of his ‘transcendence’ of race, evidence of a colour-blind political philosophy, or a ‘deracialised’ approach to governance. It argues that structural forces—particularly the confluence of racial attitudes and partisanship at the national and state levels—help to explain the limited success of his policy agenda.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Johnson, R. (2017). Racially Polarised Partisanship and the Obama Presidency. In The Obama Presidency and the Politics of Change (pp. 161–180). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41033-3_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free